Part 1: Are we heading towards RECESSION?

Recessions affect everybody in one way or another. With that in mind, I think it is important to define what a recession is and to examine if one is in the cards in the near term.

The academic definition of a recession is a contraction in the economy. This is still a fairly vague definition so the generally accepted definition is an economy that experiences 2 straight quarters of negative GDP growth.

Let us now define GDP. GDP stands for Gross Domestic Product. GDP is the total monetary (dollar) value of all the finished goods and services by a country. As you have probably heard, the GDP of the United States per year is about 20 trillion, so that means in the United States 20 trillion dollars worth of goods and services is produced per year.

I am going to take GDP one step further. At equilibrium GDP, GDP is equal to total spending. Total spending is made up of 4 categories. Using transitive property, GDP is equal to these 4 categories: consumer spending (~$14 trillion), government spending (~$4 trillion), investment spending (~$3 trillion), and net exports (~-$1 trillion). The main takeaway here is that consumer spending makes up about 70% of GDP.

With the importance of the consumer relative to the economy in mind, let us examine the current fiscal health of the US consumer. There are two ways a consumer can spend. The individual can either spend their savings, or the individual can take on debt to spend.

As you can see below, the US consumer is once again strapped for cash at ominous levels like those seen in the years proceeding the last two recessions. Recessions are marked by gray bars.

David Rosenberg
@EconguyRosie
Author of the daily economic report, Breakfast with Dave, and Chief Economist & Strategist at Gluskin Sheff + Associates Inc.

How long can the consumer continue to spend via debt then? Below you will see the year over year % change in bank credit. One can see that prior to recessions, banks tend to slow down the rate at which they provide loans to the consumer and businesses. In short prior to recessions, bank credit slowly dries up. This makes it harder for consumers to continue to spend more and more quarter after quarter.

Dr. Lacy Hunt
http://www.hoisingtonmgt.com/

The mechanics of bank credit drying up make sense, since interest rates have been steadily rising. As interest rates rise, loans become more expensive. Loans, like any other good, have a price. The price of the loan is the interest rate, so as interests rates rise, less people take on debt to consume. Below you will see a variety of interest rates, which are all rising.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FEDFUNDS#0

What are the forecasts currently predicting? The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow is currently predicting 2018 Q4 GDP growth to come in at 2.8%. For reference, Q1 GDP growth was 2.2%, Q2 GDP growth was 4.2%, and Q3 GDP growth was 3.4%.

https://www.frbatlanta.org/-/media/documents/cqer/researchcq/gdpnow/RealGDPTrackingSlides.pdf

Making predictions on GDP can be very difficult. The main issue in my opinion with the forecast is trying to quantify the human variable. My current stance is that the statistics are not placing enough respect on the non-sustainability of tax-cut sugar highs, the trade war reaction, and the reverse wealth effect.

The theory behind non-sustainability of tax-cut sugar highs is that the Trump tax cuts created a strong earnings boost and euphoria in the economy. First, many companies were essentially given free cash flow that they had not previously expected to have, which is theoretically positive for an economy (not going to get into the fact that the tax cuts were funded with debt). With this in mind, I am taking a bet that analysts will over extrapolate the benefits of the tax cuts into the future.

The trade war overreaction means that businesses decided to get ahead on the production of goods due to the coming tariffs. If you run a business, and you know that the goods you need to produce your product are about to be subject to tariffs, then you will purchase those goods in advance to avoid the tariffs. In Q3 0f 2018, inventories could be attributed to 2.33% of GDP. This means that without the rise in inventories due to preemptive tariff reaction, Q3 GDP may have been closer to 1%.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/A014RY2Q224SBEA
@michaellebowitz
Co-Founder 720 Global/ Partner at Real Investment Advice. Strategic Expertise: Macro-Econ, Asset Alloc, Valuation, Risk Mgt.

The last behavioral variable to hit the markets that I will speak about is the reverse wealth effect. This one can simply be defined as feeling richer or feeling poorer. For example, when your stock portfolio is appreciating, you may be more likely to spend due to the larger unrealized gains present in your portfolio. On the other hand, if your portfolio is depreciating, then you may spend less due to the fact that you will feel poorer as your unrealized gains will have fallen in value.

If we are heading towards recession soon, then Q4 GDP 2018 will need to show decline. It will be interesting to see if some of the behavioral variables end up creating a significant discrepancy of the outcome from the forecasts.

The Art of Contrary Thinking by Humphrey B. Neill (pg. 127)

A government doesn’t go around quietly asking people if they wish to go to war. A series of charges against the “enemy state” is trumped up; cries against the aggressor pour forth, as the propaganda machine gets in motion. An image is fashioned in the peoples’ minds of this dangerous, armed “imperialist” who is about to take their homes and ruin their existence.

Some Takeaways from Macrovoices Live and the Vancouver Resource Investment Conference 2019

I had an amazing time at the conferences, and I am incredibly appreciative of the work that was put in by the hosts and administrators. Looking forward to whats next!

Must Read – Reminiscences of a Stock Operator

When a yield curve is flattening, a “bull steepener” is when the 2 year strengthens, and a “bear steepener” is when the 10 year weakens.

The idea of “voting with money”

The stock market is a “behavioral exercise.”

Liquidity drives markets in the short to intermediate term.

The market is an aggregation of agreements and disagreements

Holding losers is not just negative due to opportunity costs, but emotional capital as well.

Rolling protective options is good risk management.

It is likely a good idea to always hedge yourself using options. Keep in mind this may burn around of 30-40% of your profits.

Lose small win big

Volume profiling allows one to see where price interest is greatest in a market.

Vega risk is when you buy an option during a high volatility time, and volatility returns to normal.

Abusing the wealth effect lever has caused the FED to become subservient to risk assets.

Demand changes slower than supply in the oil market.

The dynamite fishing analogy. When liquidity tightens, many small fish die and start to present themselves. The whale is dead. In time, the whale will reach the surface as well.

There are more fools than money.

With the yuan oil contract, to an extent, one could say that oil can be traded for gold for the first time since World War 2.

The renminbi is like the Bundesbank of Asia. US central banks have the equity market at heart, and the Germans have the bond market at heart.

Debt default probabilities should be deemed higher when debt is held by foreigners.

Do not forget that China and India make up approximately 40% of the world’s population.

Gold price per ounce correlates with total debt.

Fun chart in below link showing periodic table of commodity returns.

http://www.usfunds.com/interactive/the-periodic-table-of-commodity-returns-2018/?utm_source=home&utm_medium=insights

China makes up about 50% of commodity demand.

GDP is like looking out the back window of your car, and PMI is like looking out the front window.

About 70% of day trading is made up of high frequency research.

The US imports about 98% of its uranium.

Saudis have been known to drive out high cost US shale producers and OPEC competition by increasing supply.

A good option strategy may be to buy up in the money calls up an IPO.

There is no cap on gold because there is no floor on the dollar.

Do private placements when management needs you, not the other way around.

You want management with skin in the game.

An easy gold strategy to follow would be to decide x% that you want gold in your portfolio and rebalance accordingly.

The fact that many bonds pay a negative real yield may make up for gold storage costs.

Stop losses do not guarantee your risk management.

Term structure is like the yield curve for commodities.

The immediate contango in the WTI futures is to incentivize the storage farmers to store/deliver. There is plenty of oil in the future, which means you need storage, so you need contango.

The shape of the curve is by no means a price prediction.

Producing your own commodities is key to domestic geopolitical risk.

2 pounds of vanadium added to 1 tonne of steel will make the steel twice as strong.

Let’s Talk about Liquidity

An interesting debate in the world of finance is what drives markets? Some say fundamentals and some say liquidity.

This is a relatively advanced topic, but let’s dive in. Fundamentals are the characteristics of the securities within the markets. These characteristics for example could be PE ratios, which can be used to suggest valuation relative to other markets and historical precedent. The idea is that if stocks are cheap, then they will go up and vice versa. On the other hand of the debate is liquidity. Liquidity is like the Brita filter in your kitchen and everyone’s cups are different markets. If the Brita filter has water in it, then markets can rise.

The tough question for me has been defining and quantifying liquidity beyond that abstract definition. The first definition you learn on liquidity is the ease at which you can get in and out of a market. Essentially, this is the idea that there is another buyer when you want to sell. If there is no next buyer, then the market price for the asset will go down to create a buyer.

The original question devolves to what causes markets to have a next buyer so that prices do not descend in search of the next buyer? Is it fundamentals or liquidity?

The question I propose to the audience is when fundamentals no longer support stock prices, how can fundamentals continue to drive markets higher? This is where I believe the debate takes a decisive turn. I believe both stances are correct under specific market conditions. If liquidity is overabundant, then I believe that liquidity overpowers fundamentals and drives markets. If liquidity is not filling everyone’s cups, then I believe fundamentals drive markets. There are nuances to this, but this is the main point.

I will now use this mental framework to discuss current market conditions. Being a fan of mean reversion and a skeptic of “this time is different,” I will use the Shiller PE ratio to discuss fundamentals. The fundamentals show us that the Shiller PE ratio is at its third highest level, which suggests third highest level of overvaluation in history. For you to believe that fundamentals drive markets you would have to believe that earnings will move up in order to compress PE ratios to normal levels. I have created a graph of S&P 500 earnings by year since 1950 in blue with a moving average line in orange. This graph is particularly interesting because it suggests that over time earnings revert to the mean. Earnings are currently at all time highs, so for fundamentals to drive markets it means you place a higher likelihood on further record earnings than the eventual reversion to the mean that has happened time and time again.

http://www.multpl.com/shiller-pe/
Data from http://www.multpl.com/s-p-500-earnings/

So where does liquidity come from? The main source is the central banks. Quantitative easing is a complex term, but it really just means central bank asset purchases. This means that the central bank enters the markets, buys assets, and electronically creates currency to give to the previous owner of the asset. This expands the money supply. We operate under a system called fractional reserve banking. The reserve requirement is 10%. This means that when a bank eventually receives this new liquid currency, they have the ability to lend 90% of it out. This 90% eventually finds itself in another bank that can lend out 81% of it and so on. What you need to understand is the vast power global quantitative easing has on supporting and boosting asset prices like stocks.

Below, you will find a chart of quantitative easing since 2003 by the Fed (US central bank), ECB (European Central Bank), BOJ (Bank of Japan), and China. Further below, I have created a chart of the S&P 500 that highlights, to the best of visual ability, time periods where global QE went from extremes to near zero. You can see that markets struggled in these time periods until Global QE returned.

@zerohedge
S&P 500
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/%5EGSPC/chart?p=%5EGSPC#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%3D%3D

So do fundamentals or liquidity drive markets? I think prior to 2006, I would have said fundamentals. Since 2008 though, we have entered the global quantitative easing experiment, and it is tough to dismiss the power of liquidity.